I guess you don't get a regular column about your gaffes, such as "Bushisms"

until you're president, but to me the things Wes Clark is saying are a whole lot worse that mixing up words or words like "strategery." With Bush you know what he's trying to say. With Clark and Dean, you know what they said but you wonder why anybody would want to vote for such an arrogant jackass. Where's the flood of editorials about Clark's "secret plan" to end terrorist attacks if he's elected?