If they have a reason to oppose him,

why do they keep demanding more of Robert's work product. Here's a proposal. How about PFAW or NARAL's attorneys publish all of their privileged memos to their clients? I mean if they're really "for the American way," why should they object to releasing this stuff?

Remember the flap when Democrat memos in the Senate's computers got into the hands of Republican staffers? The exact same arguments apply. They were financed with taxpayers' money. Why shouldn't they be public?