Slow news day.

It must be tough to have to write stories day after day about somebody as non-newsworthy as John Roberts has been all of his life? Dana Milbank tries, but fails to make Roberts' distaste for Michael Jackson, back in 1984, sound like--what, racism, fogeyism? Actually for most people, given recent events in Jackson's history, it sounds like pretty good sense. Anybody who could watch fifteen minutes of an interview with Jacko and not think he's got severe personal problems, is not qualified to be appointed the the Supreme Court. I guess if Jackson gets convicted of child molesting later, and appeals it to SCOTUS, Roberts can recuse himself.

Wouldn't it be easier just to tell Milbank he doesn't have to file a report on every box of documents?