Sunday, March 18, 2012

Mark Steyn
But obviously Rutherford B. Hayes isn’t as “forward-looking” as a 21st-century president who believes in Jimmy Carter malaise, 1970s Eurostatist industrial policy, 1940s British health-care reforms, 1930s New Deal–sized entitlements premised on mid-20th-century birth rates and life expectancy, and all paid for by a budget with more zeroes than anybody’s seen since the Weimar Republic. If that’s not a shoo-in for Mount Rushmore, I don’t know what is.
They can call themselves "progressive" but they seem to end up repeating the same mistakes with the bullheadedness of the ignorant.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home